setup.exe for 1.7 and patches?
Ralph Hempel
rhempel@bmts.com
Mon Jul 21 16:04:00 GMT 2008
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> You start by discussing setup.exe development where you've already sent
> email - the cygwin-apps mailing list.
My fault for not watching what Thunderbird was auto-completing
for me. Fixed.
> As far as the compilation errors are concerned, weren't you going to try
> to get the patches working? It seems like you need to fix the
> compilation errors if you want to help. If you can't fix compilation
> problems then it isn't clear how you are going to help building and
> testing setup, considering that you are trying to add new functionality.
Based on Reini's note, I was under the impression that the three patches
would apply cleanly to HEAD, and they don't.
What I'm trying to get clear on is whether I shoud be trying to get
the setup for 1.7 (snapshot 2.592) working with the patches.
I got some of the compilation errors fixed, then decided to the CVS
viewer to figure out which tag to pull out to get the setup for 1.7
- the result was inconclusive.
So, which tag should I be referencing in the CVS tree to get the
version of setup that will be released with 1.7?
Cheers, Ralph
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list