[itp] Coda filesystem
Phil Nelson
phil@cs.wwu.edu
Wed Sep 5 00:03:00 GMT 2007
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 3:53:17 pm d.henman wrote:
> I am not an expert of current distributed files systems, but for cygwin wouldn't
> MogileFS be easier to implement (even though its not a fs in and of itslef). From
> my understanding it only requires perl and mysql I believe.
>
> Ref: http://www.danga.com/mogilefs/
The real intent of my questions was more like:
We are already managing cygwin packages in a private
cygwin mirror for Coda. We would like to make the packages
be on all cygwin mirrors.
I wasn't asking just to bring in a distributed file system. And
Coda and MogileFS are not really similar file systems.
From the web site:
" you don't run regular Unix applications or databases against MogileFS.
It's meant for archiving write-once files and doing only sequential reads."
While you can't have a database file in Coda either, Coda is a full R/W
distributed file system with "disconnected operation". But I don't want
to end up in a discussion of Coda vs any other FS, I just wanted a
discussion of inclusion of Coda or not.
--Phil
--
Phil Nelson (phil@cs.wwu.edu) http://www.cs.wwu.edu/nelson
NetBSD: http://www.NetBSD.org Coda: http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/attachments/20070905/7ad68f37/attachment.sig>
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list