"submission rules page" proposal number 2

[Christopher Faylor]

On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:38:22PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:33:23AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>>When you're happy with it tell me: I will integrate it with the rest of
>>the HTML present in the page, in order to be uploadable in stead of the
>>"old" one.
>
>I think it is close but there are a couple of other random thing:

And, to address Jari's point, I guess it can't be as simple as:

  # If the new package is a well-known program already included in a
  major Linux distribution (e.g.  Debian, Fedora, SuSE) please include
  the URL of the package page.

But has to say something about non-testing, non-development, non-unstable.

  # If the new package is a well-known program already included in a
  major Linux distribution (e.g.  Debian, Fedora, SuSE) please include
  the URL of the package page which shows the package.  Note that
  "development", "test", and "unstable" packages are not eligible for
  this rule.

(please massage the above as appropriate)

Lapo, if you make a combined page which addresses this and my previous
points I'll put it up ASAP.

cgf