tetex postinstall suggestion

[Max Bowsher]

Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Max Bowsher writes:
>
>> In this way, there will be some visible indication in setup.exe that
>> progress is occurring.
>
> I see what you mean, but that's quite a hack.  What about having setup
> display some progress indication based on the amount of console output
> that is printed?

How can setup display any meaningful progress, without knowing an upper 
bound?

In the case of my suggestion, setup does know an upper bound, because it 
knows the number of scripts it plans to run.

Max.