please test new setup

[Brian Dessent]

Max Bowsher wrote:

> > You're right, it's not really Redhat's copyright.  I changed it to say
> > "Copyright 2001-2005 Redhat" because the previous value "Copyright
> > 2000,2001" seemed a bit out of date.  What about, "Copyright 2000-2005
> > Redhat and various contributors"?
> 
> Yes, I think thats fine (though IANAL).
> 
> But, "Red Hat", not "Redhat".

I'll defer to whatever cgf or Corinna says.  It seems there's no files
with Red Hat copyrights past 2001, so it's probably not a good idea to
attribute them something they don't have.  I honestly hadn't given much
thought to this when I made the change.  I'm thinking perhaps something
along the lines: "Copyright 2000, 2001 Red Hat Inc.\r\nCopyright
2001-2005 Various contributors"

Brian