[Cygnome2-devel] Re: My pending ITPs / votes & reviews wanted

[Christopher Faylor]

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:38:22AM +0800, Hansom Young wrote:
>As to the prefix (/opt/gnome2 or standard /), ....  headache If it's
>not /opt/gnome2, we have to rebuild most packages when we have
>glib2/gtk2 from Cygwin net release.  What's the others' opinion?

I'm not against using /opt.  I wouldn't want this to be a stumbling block.  How
does Red Hat manage to avoid using /opt, though?  Do they just patch the heck
out of everything.
--
Christopher Faylor			spammer? ->	aaaspam@sourceware.org
Cygwin Co-Project Leader				aaaspam@duffek.com
TimeSys, Inc.