Two new "categories" created. Comment needed
Wed Apr 7 21:49:00 GMT 2004
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 05:22:32PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > >FWIW, it would be a trivial patch to the chooser code to, for example,
> > >grey out packages in the "_RemovedPackages" category (once we settle on
> > >the name).
> > I like this idea, if by "greyed out" you also mean unselectable.
> > >Another thing I was thinking of was the "if it's removed, why is it
> > >selected" attitude. That, however, needs something more than just keeping
> > >the other categories around...
> > Hmm. Maybe you don't. If it is greyed out but still gets selected in
> > some way, then I don't think it will be clear what's going on.
> > cgf
> Nope, I just meant the color change to grey. However, it's better than
> what's there now...
Besides, if it were unselectable, there would be no way to revert to the
previous version (which wasn't in "_Removed" at the time)...
|\ _,,,---,,_ firstname.lastname@example.org
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ email@example.com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton
More information about the Cygwin-apps