Trivial ChangeLog amendment for setup-200206 branch

[Max Bowsher]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:12:21PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> I was just working on extracting the correct changelog entries for the
>> release notes for the upcoming setup release, when I discovered an
>> accidental deletion of an entry.
>>
>> OK to apply this to the 2.249 branch?
>
> I think that ChangeLog entries about ChangeLog entries are rather
> redundant. Since a ChangeLog is documentation, I don't see any reason to
> be self-referential.

I wanted to document that although the ChangeLog entry had been backed out,
the code changes had not.

How do you think it is best to do this?

Max.