juggling patches...
Gary R. Van Sickle
g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net
Thu Mar 20 06:31:00 GMT 2003
[snip]
> I think most folks who use/develop/understand cygwin will be more
> accomodating to Larry's licensing terms than the l-k hackers are, given
> the dual licensing nature of cygwin itself. You don't see a lot of
> RMS-style license-vigelante-ism around here [it's GNU/Linux, dammit!
> GPL or die! GNU/Cygwin! GNU/AIX! GNU/refridgerator! GNU/basketball!
^^^^^^^^^^^
Holy frejolies, PAH-LEEZE tell me that you just made that one up! PLEASE tell
me nobody has actually floated that notion seriously!
[snip]
>
> BTW, [FUD warning; I am NOT sure of the following] isn't there a "no
> free use on proprietary operating systems" clause in the bitkeeper
> license? E.g. you can't run it (for free) under windows?
Don't you mean "GNU/Cygwin/Windows"? ;-)
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer. Patriot.
More information about the Cygwin-apps
mailing list