/etc/setup/setup.cfg ?

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:

> > On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >
> > > > On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:58, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:49:27AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > > > > >Also, I'd prefer /etc/setup.rc rather that /etc/setup/setup.cfg.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wouldn't /etc/setuprc be somewhat more consistent with existing unix
> > > > > practices?
> > > >
> > > > Sure. I'm happy with that too. Mind you, having an extension allows
> > > > association of a handler in the windows GUI.
> > > >
> > >
> > > *.rc is a Windows resource file though.
> >
> > ... which was the primary reason for my suggesting .cfg in the first
> > place.  I'm ok with both setuprc and setup.rc, through (leaning towards
> > setuprc, if we go with Unix style).
>
> How about [/etc/]setup.conf ? it follows the (other) unix convention of
> configuration file naming.
>
> Regards,
> Elfyn McBratney

Perfect.  Now, why didn't I think of that? (tm)
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor@watson.ibm.com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

Oh, boy, virtual memory! Now I'm gonna make myself a really *big* RAMdisk!
  -- /usr/games/fortune