Pending packages status

[Charles Wilson]

Pavel Tsekov wrote:

> My work here is simple - keep a list of packages so people won't forget
> about them. Now I see that I've overestimated my responsibilities 
> for which I apologise. The important thing is to keep the packages coming.

Don't go away mad.  I heartily appreciate your efforts to prevent 
contributions from getting lost.  (It's not like we have so many 
contributors that we can afford to alienate them by forgetting about 
their contribution).

I took your [original] comments to be just like those of any other 
reviewer: subject to disagreement (and revision).  We can 
agree/disagree/argue on the list about specific requirements for 
specific packages or for packages in general; the goal is to get good 
packages into the distribution.  IMO, this entire discussion is 
unrelated to the admirable job you're doing with the 
list-of-pending-contributions.  [Which is now up to almost 10, 
unfortunately -- and I've got two more to add soon <g>]

--Chuck