Review required for whitespace changes?

Robert Collins rbcollins@cygwin.com
Wed Jul 23 01:52:00 GMT 2003


On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 11:46, Christopher Faylor wrote:


> I'd submit that if the motivation for a comment change isn't obvious
> then the comment change either shouldn't have been made or the comment
> isn't clear.

I agree. Thats why I qualified the rule-of-thumb: comment changes as
part of a larger change - no need to mention. comment changes on their
own though, I'd like to know /why/ they needed to change. (Other than
the blindingly obvious fixup-a-spelling-error).

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/attachments/20030723/96a274b8/attachment.sig>


More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list