[PATCH] Bigger Chooser Part 3 In Super 3-D: RECTPP

Max Bowsher maxb@ukf.net
Sun Apr 6 10:28:00 GMT 2003


Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 20:15, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Robert Collins wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 19:40, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> The question is not what I'd like, but what you won't.  If RECTWrapper
>>>> is still acceptable, that's what it'll be.
>>>
>>> RECTWrapper is still acceptable.
>>
>> Can we go with RECTAdapter? It doesn't wrap, and since Robert said
>> RECTAdapter was also OK, we might as well use that.
>
> Sure. RECTAdapter is also OK. I don't care which.
>
> As a data point: it does wrap though - as it inherits from RECT.

Must... not... start... discussion... of... semantics... of... the...
word... "wrap"!
:-)

>> For the record, Robert, I still think RECTPP is the best name.
>
> I understand that, but disagree. I thought it was pretty clear in my
> first review email!

Crystal clear. But I've only just given up trying to persuade you otherwise!

Max.



More information about the Cygwin-apps mailing list