[PATCH 0/3] v2: Experimental patches and musl-libc

[Bryan Hundven]

This patch series is based on a patch by Timo TerÃs:
    http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/257187/

I ran into a brick wall trying to do this the first time here:
    https://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2014-07/msg00017.html

and this is my attempt to make things more manageable and explicit that these patches are experimental and not supported by crosstool-ng.

As with the previous patch set, this is [RFC].

I have one more patch to send that is more RFC then this set that allows specific patch tuning, but in the meantime this patch set works.

Also, to note my previous patch set:
Currently a minimal armel- is the only target tested. Please let me know your experiences, comments, feedback, and/or suggestions.


--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq