[PATCH] Fixup the static toolchain build problem
brock.zheng
goodmenlinux@gmail.com
Fri Jul 11 01:15:00 GMT 2014
Hi, Yan
The new patch is attathed. I remove the "-static" option,
because I have tested, and the result shows that the "-all-staic" is enough
to create the static toolchain.
If "-static" is places ahead of "-all-static", the later one will no take
the effect, and the static toolchain build will fail at binutils stage.
Would you please have a review?
On 2014-07-08 22:09:54, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 22:09:54 +0200
> From: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
> To: "brock.zheng" <goodmenzy@gmail.com>
> Cc: crosstool-NG ML <crossgcc@sourceware.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixup the static toolchain build problem
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
>
> Brock, All,
>
> On 2014-07-08 20:29 +0800, brock.zheng spake thusly:
> > When build binutils, libtool tried to translate -lfl to /usr/lib/libfl.so
> > But when change to "LDFLAGS=-all-static -static", libtool works fine.
> > -lfl will be translated to /usr/lib/libfl.a
>
> Here are a few comments on your patch.
>
> First you forgot to add your Signed-oof-by to the patch, so we can't use
> it. See:
> http://crosstool-ng.org/git/crosstool-ng/tree/docs/7%20-%20Contributing%20to%20crosstool-NG.txt
>
> Second, in a previous mail, you said:
>
> I have checked the libtool script, and found that the following option
> -all-static
> -static
> -static-libtool-libs
> is processed in a strange way. If any one of those three option appears
> firstly in the cmdline, all others
> will be neglected. Our LDFLAGS is ".... -static -all-static -o", so the
> -static option takes the real effect,
> and the -all-static has no useage actually! that is the cause of the
> failure.
>
> So, if only the first option is in effect, why do we still cary the
> -static ?
>
> Otherwise, I'm not opposed to the idea. ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
> > ---
> > scripts/build/binutils/binutils.sh | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/build/binutils/binutils.sh b/scripts/build/binutils/binutils.sh
> > index b6207be..cc57b5a 100644
> > --- a/scripts/build/binutils/binutils.sh
> > +++ b/scripts/build/binutils/binutils.sh
> > @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ do_binutils_backend() {
> > "${CT_BINUTILS_EXTRA_CONFIG_ARRAY[@]}"
> >
> > if [ "${static_build}" = "y" ]; then
> > - extra_make_flags+=("LDFLAGS=-static -all-static")
> > + extra_make_flags+=("LDFLAGS=-all-static -static")
> > CT_DoLog EXTRA "Prepare binutils for static build"
> > CT_DoExecLog ALL make ${JOBSFLAGS} configure-host
> > fi
> > --
> > 2.0.1
> >
>
> --
> .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
> | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
> | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
> | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
> | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
> '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
>
> --
> For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
>
--
Brock Zheng <yzheng@techyauld.com>
é ç¥
å京ä¸ç§è
¾è¶ç§æå屿éå
¬å¸
åäº¬å¸æµ·æ·åºä¸åæºè¥¿è·¯8å·ä¸å
³æè½¯ä»¶å21å·æ¥¼å¯ææè¾°å¤§å¦äºå±å
åºï¼é®ç¼ï¼100094ï¼
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-binutils-Fixup-the-static-toolchain-build-problem.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1478 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/crossgcc/attachments/20140711/0f2f35f8/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list