why build start files before core gcc pass 2 ?
Yann E. MORIN
yann.morin.1998@free.fr
Sat Mar 2 15:21:00 GMT 2013
Esben, All,
On Saturday 02 March 2013 Esben Haabendal wrote:
> "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> writes:
> > However, if any one comes up with a way to build NPTL, that does involve
> > only two gcc steps, and is *sane*,
>
> What is the definition of sane here?
For one, all current samples continue to work as before.
Then, a patchset that brings changes one after the other. It might be
a bit complex to do, since I expect such a change to impact everything
about all at once, but I'd be very reluctant to apply a thousands-lines
long patch in the first place.
Finally, the new code should be commented, and better yet, the whole
new process should be dully documented and explained.
> "Prove boyond any doubt" is a really
> _HARD_ task here, and in this case, for most people not really feasible.
Yes, this is difficult. But I'm not trading a *known working* situation
that is not optimum, for a suposedly-better situation that is not working
(for the sake of not existing so far).
But, as they used to say: show me the code! ;-)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list