Mercurial workflow and git/mercurial integration
Yann E. MORIN
yann.morin.1998@free.fr
Mon Oct 22 17:31:00 GMT 2012
Samuel, All,
On Monday 22 October 2012 Samuel Martin wrote:
> 2012/10/22 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>:
> > Or will Yann accept patches not having this header?
> That's it... or we can hope that Yann switch soon to the most powerful
> scm software: git :P
Well, I agree that git is "more powerful", in a purely technical sense.
However, I am not as confortable with git as I am with Mercutrial, from
a maintainer's point of view. I'm too afraid to bork things using git.
On the other hand, I'm now used to using Mercurial, and I know how to
handle it. It has proved easy to use to do the maintenance.
And we haven't reached the point (and I doubt we ever will) where the
crosstool-NG workflow is too complex that it would require a more powerful
like git.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list