GCC being built without optimisation

[Johannes Stezenbach]

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 02:06:18PM +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
> On 14 November 2012 13:30, Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 November 2012 Michael Hope wrote:
> >> It turns out that GCC and the libraries are being built without
> >> optimisation.
...
> --- a/scripts/crosstool-NG.sh.in	Fri Nov 09 18:22:31 2012 +0100
> +++ b/scripts/crosstool-NG.sh.in	Wed Nov 14 13:48:18 2012 +1300
> @@ -494,7 +494,9 @@
>      fi
> 
>      # Help gcc
> -    CT_CFLAGS_FOR_HOST=
> +    # Explicitly optimise, else the lines below will overide the
> +    # package's default optimisation flags
> +    CT_CFLAGS_FOR_HOST="-O2 -g"
>      [ "${CT_USE_PIPES}" = "y" ] && CT_CFLAGS_FOR_HOST+=" -pipe"
>      CT_CFLAGS_FOR_HOST+=" ${CT_EXTRA_FLAGS_FOR_HOST}"

FWIW, I brought this issue up in February:
http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2012-02/msg00089.html

I should've sent a patch but it was so easy to just
use CT_EXTRA_FLAGS_FOR_HOST...

Johannes

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq