Request for testing: canadian rework
Mon Aug 6 18:50:00 GMT 2012
"Yann E. MORIN" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Esben, All,
> On Monday 06 August 2012 08:31:35 Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> "Yann E. MORIN" <email@example.com> writes:
>> > On Saturday 21 April 2012 20:45:24 Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> >> "Yann E. MORIN" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> >> > Changes (from 4.000 feet high):
>> >> > - no need for a pre-exisiting x-compiler for the target
>> >> > - a complete x-compiler for target is built for internal use, but is not
>> >> > exported for the user to use
>> >> Will it still be possible to use a pre-existing x-compiler for target?
>> >> It would be nice to be able to not have to build the same target
>> >> x-compiler three times.
>> > I believe this will be easy to re-add in the next release, though. The code
>> > was there anyway, it's just a matter to re-enable it.
>> Did this change make it into 1.16.0 ?
> Nope, I was busy IRL with other stuff lately,
Bah, you can take care of IRL in your next life ;-)
> and centered this release on bug-fixing. Probably next time.
Ok. I will be happy to help test and debug it. Until then, I am stuck
on ct-NG releases before the canadian rework in OE-lite.
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc