Request for testing: canadian rework
Mon Aug 6 06:32:00 GMT 2012
"Yann E. MORIN" <email@example.com> writes:
> Esben, All,
> On Saturday 21 April 2012 20:45:24 Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> "Yann E. MORIN" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > Changes (from 4.000 feet high):
>> > - no need for a pre-exisiting x-compiler for the target
>> > - a complete x-compiler for target is built for internal use, but is not
>> > exported for the user to use
>> Will it still be possible to use a pre-existing x-compiler for target?
>> When building let's say 3 canadian-cross crompilers, fx.
>> i686-linux -> arm-linux
>> x86_64-linux -> arm-linux
>> mingw32 -> arm-linux
>> It would be nice to be able to not have to build the same target
>> x-compiler three times.
> Ah, I did not think of this use-case... No, the new infra will not allow
> that. The whole purpose was to get rid of the separate cross-compiler build,
> to be able to build the canadian cross in one run (except of course the
> cross- compiler for the host which is needed anyway to cross-build all the
> other stuff for the host).
> I believe this will be easy to re-add in the next release, though. The code
> was there anyway, it's just a matter to re-enable it.
> Thanks for the suggestion!
Did this change make it into 1.16.0 ?
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc