[PATCH] Look for libraries in "lib64" as well as in "lib"
Ralf Corsepius
rc040203@freenet.de
Wed Sep 29 15:03:00 GMT 2010
On 09/29/2010 04:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 10:37:32 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 09/29/2010 04:32 PM, Anthony Foiani wrote:
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User Anthony Foiani<anthony.foiani@gmail.com>
>>> # Date 1285770476 21600
>>> # Node ID 5676bb6d9d7a61a062d0b8bf86c9ddccfcae4f7c
>>> # Parent ff2181adbd28c91a21fa5f230bf92aaa7824dc73
>>> Look for libraries in "lib64" as well as in "lib".
>>>
>>> On Fedora x86_64 systems, many libraries are in "lib64" directories,
>>> not plain old "lib".
>> This patch doesn't make sense: lib64 and lib are not supposed to be
>> mixed, but to be mutually exclusive.
> yes, but the script has a hard time figuring out which the build system should
> be using
Right, this is a design limitation.
Instead of poking around into run-time libraries, it should try to
examine the system by using the mechanisms gcc provides, eg.:
gcc $CFLAGS -print-multi-os-directory
or to apply compile/linktests (this is what autoconf does)
or to let the user manually specify settings (This is what fedora does
when building fedora packages).
> a better idea though would be to simply sync up with the code in the linux
> kernel as it already works with multilib systems -- it has dropped the manual
> library search patch
Sorry, I am not familiar with this approach - I am a GCC and a Fedora
guy, not a kernel guy ;)
Ralf
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list