fenv.h not found?
Arnaud Lacombe
lacombar@gmail.com
Tue Oct 19 14:50:00 GMT 2010
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> wrote:
> Arnaud,
>
> I think the gxx-include-dir param is a workaround.
>
no, it's just a plain bug.
> I believe that something else is falling off the rails early during
> the ct-ng build that cause (e)glibc to need the
> ${CT_SYSROOT_DIR}/include symlink or it installs the headers to the
> wrong spot, that ultimately screws up the final cc's g++ include
> search path.
>
I still fails to see where this "${CT_SYSROOT_DIR}/include" come from.
> I have been working on trying to figure this one out. When we can
> figure this out, we should remove the --with-gxx-include-dir!
>
it should never have been added.
> I also saw strange behavior when both
> CC_EXTRA_CONFIG=--with-long-double-128 and
> CC_GCC_LDBL_128=m were set.
>
given that the implementation is yet again buggy, I'm not surprised...
case "${CT_CC_GCC_LDBL_128}" in
Y) extra_config+=("--with-long-double-128");;
M) ;;
"") extra_config+=("--without-long-double-128");;
esac
case sentivity boys, case sensitivity...
- Arnaud
> Lets let Tony finish his build, test, and report cycle.
>
> In the mean time, lets keep working on the c++ include path issue in
> the respective thread ;-)
>
> -Bryan
>
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list