[crosstool-ng] Issue with ltrace

Thomas Petazzoni thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com
Tue Feb 2 19:29:00 GMT 2010


Hello Yann,

On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:42:37 +0100
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote:

> > The sample selects ltrace 0.5.2, while a newer version, 0.5.3 is
> > available. This newer version seems to have a fix for this issue, in
> > the form of a patch already included in crosstool-ng:
> >  patches/ltrace/0.5.3/160-fix-missing-ptrace-defines.patch
> 
> Go ahead with ltrace-0.5.3, it should buid (built just OK here).

It works fine with ltrace 0.5.3. So the samples should probably be
updated and/or ltrace 0.5.2 fixed (or removed in favor of 0.5.3 ?).

Thanks for your answer,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq



More information about the crossgcc mailing list