[PATCH 0 of 3] Add support for using gold instead of ld
Tue Dec 28 00:23:00 GMT 2010
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Bryan Hundven <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Yann E. MORIN
>> <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> Hello All!
>>> This patchset is a tentative at using gold in place of ld with recent
>>> binutils (2.21 at least).
>>> Currently, glibc can not be built with gold (fails on the ld version
>>> check), and uClibc builds fine with a minor edit in the linker flags
>>> (which is already applied upstream).
>>> Basically, the patch series adds support for building gold or ld or
>>> both, and in the latter case, set which is the default. It also adds
>>> a (shell) wrapper that can override the default at runtime.
>>> binutils/binutils: add BINUTILS_2_21_or_later blind option
>>> binutils/binutils: add option to enable gold
>>> binutils/binutils: add wrapper to gold and ld
>>> b/config/binutils/binutils.in | 88 88 0 0 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> b/scripts/build/binutils/binutils-ld.in | 11 11 0 0 ++++
>>> b/scripts/build/binutils/binutils.sh | 37 36 1 0 +++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> That is incomplete You also need to pass --enable-gold to gcc's
>> configure to build the linker plugin.
> Right. Is this only when ld.gold is ld?
> Or just when gold is enabled at all.
Actually, to answer my own question, for gcc 4.5.x, the only option is
to --enable-gold (just like binutils 2.20x). for gcc 4.6.x the options
would be the same as binutils 2.21.
>> - Arnaud
>> For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
> I will test this stuff tonight (-0800) with the gcc --enable-gold option.
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc