Git mirror of Crosstool-ng
Enrico Weigelt
weigelt@metux.de
Tue Aug 17 15:39:00 GMT 2010
* Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote:
> OK, I'm fine with a git-clone of the tree. But please make
> it explicit that this tree is only a clone, not the upstream.
ACK. If the mirror is always up-to-date (maybe on hourly schedule),
I'd like to use it instead of hg, since ct-ng is the only reason
for keeping hg for me now, and all my workflows are based on git.
> Also, I'd like to point out that, as a maintainer, dealing with
> non-Mercurial patches is really a PITA.
Is there any reason, git-formatted patches dont work for you ?
> And *no*, I'm not switching to git. :-)
What are the reasons for using hg ?
cu
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/
phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de
mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list