ARM with old kernel

Acharya Partha partha_acharya@yahoo.com
Wed Jan 28 04:20:00 GMT 2009


Andy

You didn't mention about the libc version earlier ,also the problem got resolved from glibc-2.8 onwards.

Regards
Partha


--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Andy Johnson <ajohnson@aecno.com> wrote:

> From: Andy Johnson <ajohnson@aecno.com>
> Subject: RE: ARM with old kernel
> To: crossgcc@sourceware.org
> Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 11:04 AM
> Everyone,
> 
> > The problem seems to be solved by the attached patch ,
> as I had faced
> the
> > similar problem earlier. Please try it and let me know
> if it works for
> you.
> > 
> > Regards
> > Partha Acharya
> 
> Is this for the configure file in the glibc source root? 
> Which version
> of glibc is this for?  At what point did you apply this
> patch, before
> the build starts, or do you need to have it stop so you can
> apply it
> manually?
> 
> Anyway, I thought I was able to solve the problem a
> different way.
> I had also tried to use a current kernel, but set the
> support kernel
> version option to 2.6.9 (my target system).  It would die
> with the error
> in this link (but build OK when I didn't set the kernel
> version):
> 
> http://www.nabble.com/arm-linux-compilation-failure-and-possible-fix-td1
> 9229074.html
> 
> The patch is supposed to work for glibc 2_8, but I have
> only tested it
> for glibc 2.7 and 2_9.  Basically it's a one line fix
> to add an include
> for tls.h to lowlevellock.h.  It builds without errors, but
> when I try
> to run an application built with it, I get "Hello
> World!" followed by
> an invalid instruction error.  It's progress if one
> considers that at
> least I get some output whereas I didn't before. 
> Again, I'm back to
> the old "just because it builds without errors
> doesn't mean it ain't
> broke".
> 
> Andy Johnson
> 
> --
> For unsubscribe information see
> http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq


      

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq



More information about the crossgcc mailing list