Mon Jan 12 20:55:00 GMT 2009
On Monday 12 January 2009 15:34:59 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> On Monday 12 January 2009 21:25:10 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> > [--SNIP--]
> > > Isn't it a little bit strange to add stuffs in the
> > > ia64_save_regs_in_stack.S file, and then remove them right after ?
> > > Couldn't we just drop those 2 first hunks ?
> On a second though, no, we should not. It's not the same file!
> The first hink creates a file with an upper-case .S extension, while the
> second hunk removes code from a file with a lower-case .s extension.
> In fact, I *think* the second hunk is wrong, because it should _remove_ the
> file altogether, rather than simply empty it.
> I will try to massage the patch a little bit so that the file effectively
> gets removed and see if an IA-64 toolchain still compiles.
> Will report back soon...
just make sure you use the -E option when running `patch` ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the crossgcc