ct-ng 220-noteGNUstack-01.patch

[Thomas Jourdan]

Hi

the 220-noteGNUstack-01.patch patch doesn't apply anymore against the
gcc 4.3.2 sources. It fails with this :

diff -durN gcc-4.3.1.orig/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.S
gcc-4.3.1/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.S
--- gcc-4.3.1.orig/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.S	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc-4.3.1/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.S	2008-06-10 14:58:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+        .text
+        .align 16
+        .global GC_save_regs_in_stack
+        .proc GC_save_regs_in_stack
+GC_save_regs_in_stack:
+        .bodyfoo.mpg
+        flushrs
+        ;;
+        mov r8=ar.bsp
+        br.ret.sptk.few rp
+        .endp GC_save_regs_in_stack
+
+#ifdef __linux__
+	.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
+#endif
diff -durN gcc-4.3.1.orig/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.s gcc-4.3.1/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.s
--- gcc-4.3.1.orig/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.s	2001-10-15 06:57:59.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc-4.3.1/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.s	2008-06-10 14:58:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-        .text
-        .align 16
-        .global GC_save_regs_in_stack
-        .proc GC_save_regs_in_stack
-GC_save_regs_in_stack:
-        .body
-        flushrs
-        ;;
-        mov r8=ar.bsp
-        br.ret.sptk.few rp
-        .endp GC_save_regs_in_stack

Isn't it a little bit strange to add stuffs in the ia64_save_regs_in_stack.S file, and then remove them right after ? Couldn't we just drop those 2 first hunks ?

Thomas



--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq