[PATCH 0 of 1] CVS retrieval of GLIBC cannot work for 2.10.1
ng@piments.com
ng@piments.com
Wed Dec 2 08:44:00 GMT 2009
Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Hello Frederic!
> Hello All!
>
> On Wednesday 02 December 2009 02:28:16 Frederic Roussel wrote:
>> I've noticed that CVS retrieval for glibc cannot work, so I made a patch
>> to disable it in glibc.in.
>
> Don't bother hacking CVS in glibc, it's going away now that there are git
> trees available. CVS is already gone in my local copy, but as git is not
> yet ready, I haven't pushed the changes yet. Should be done by the end of
> the week...
>
>> That being said, the upstream project advertizes the use of "git" rather
>> than "cvs".
>> Is there any work going on to have "git" trees retrieved ?
>
> Yes, it's almost ready.
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
Hi Yann,
could you confirm that previous installations fo ct-ng will still function?
I installed ct-ng just before you started moving to git and after a fair
bit of work getting to know it I built a toolchain matched to my
requirements.
Unless there are very important underlying reasons I do not intent to
disrupt a working tested development system , however I do need to
retain the possibility to recreate exactly the same thing should the
need arise (fs corruption, whatever ).
I have enough work on my plate using ct-ng, I really do not have the
time to learn git as well and start more learning curves and reinventing
the wheel in order to remain where I am now with a working system.
Maybe I'm misinterpreting what this is about but it would be good if you
could clarify.
Many thanks, Peter.
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list