arm & mips & glibc >= 2.4 ??

Lennert Buytenhek
Tue Feb 20 12:34:00 GMT 2007

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:47:35AM +0200, Olexiy Avramchenko wrote:

> > What are other folks doing?  Are people sticking with glibc 2.3.6
> > or older for now?
> Is there any serious reason to pick 2.4 these days? I'd prefer to
> wait until it will be in debian unstable at least.

glibc 2.5 is in debian experimental, so it getting into unstable
shouldn't be too far off?

(The current debian ARM EABI port is basically sid built with
binutils and glibc from experimental, and that works fine, BTW.)

For unsubscribe information see

More information about the crossgcc mailing list