glibc-2.4 released (was: Re: never mind: no linuxthreads in glibc-2.4)
Mon Mar 13 03:12:00 GMT 2006
On Sunday 12 March 2006 14:23, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> hmmmm ... are "ports" just considered an add-on. (asked by someone
> who has no clue what "ports" represent.)
> i know that the standard identifier for an "add-on" is any directory
> that has a "configure" file in it -- glibc will normally configure
> such subdirectories automatically. but there's no such "configure"
> file in the ports tarball so i guess glibc treats the "ports"
> directory specially.
it does ... configure will search for preconfigure fragments automatically
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc