Taking the hatchet to crosstool
Dan Kegel
dank@kegel.com
Wed Mar 8 15:01:00 GMT 2006
On 3/8/06, Martin Guy <martinwguy@gmail.com> wrote:
> I finally had enough of all those horrid files in crosstool's top
> directory ...
> * Moved *.dat to data/
> * Moved *.config to config/
> * Moved demo-*.sh to demo/
> * Moved *.sh to scripts/
> ...
> Would this create embarassment for people who have
> their own sets of patches to
> crosstool that they apply to each release?
Probably. Let's take it a bit slower, and do one of your
little cleanup steps per release.
> How do people feel about this reorganisation? Is the fresh air it
> creates worth the hassle?
What I'd like to see first is a script that generates
the demo scripts from buildlogs/*.dat.txt or buildlogs/all.dats.txt.
It would first blow away the 'demo' directory, then fill
it with a bunch of scripts.
Could you attack that? I'd gladly accept that patch.
- Dan
--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list