iWMMXt Linux EABI cross toolchain
Steven Newbury
s_j_newbury@yahoo.co.uk
Fri Mar 3 20:28:00 GMT 2006
--- Khem Raj <khem@mvista.com> wrote:
> Steven Newbury said the following on 03/03/2006 12:11 PM:
> > --- Khem Raj <khem@mvista.com> wrote:
> >
> >> As evidents from Paul's IWMMXt ABI is kind of intermediate thing which
> >> got started in same direction to refine ABI requirements but then was
> >> converted into a more detailed work to define ARM EABI therefore EABI is
> >> complete so I would suggest youto use EABI instead.
> >>
> > So if I don't specify an ABI but use --with-cpu=iwmmxt --with-arch=iwmmxt
> and
> > do as I am targeting arm-iwmmxt-linux-gnueabi it should do the right thing
> wrt
> > vectorizing etc?
> it should.
> > Or should I select AAPCS?
> >
> no
> > Is this also likely to fix my problem of missing forced-unwind when
> compiling
> > glibc??
> >
> no that probably is because you enabled thread support and C++ support
> into minimal gcc.
Yes I enabled thread support, not C++ though. I couldn't get glibc to compile
without threads; see my earlier post in this thread. So I'm stuck. :(
Maybe it's a bug in my glibc CVS pull stopping it building without threads?
I'll try updating it...
Steve
___________________________________________________________
NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online! http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list