arm eabi boot progress.
Thu Apr 27 09:54:00 GMT 2006
Which kernel headers did you finally use?
Steven Newbury wrote:
> I do believe Im there! I had two problems in the end, bash built natively and
> works perfectly. The other thing was the kernel headers. 2.6.16 headers,
> including those provided by gentoo are broken with respect to ARM EABI.
> Syscalls that were removed but still defined were confusing glibc. This is in
> addition to those that were fixed in the glibc patch.
> --- email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>On Wednesday 26 April 2006 14:01, Steven Newbury wrote:
>>>Busybox works here too. It doesnt seem to be bashy enough to init Gentoo
>>correct ... Gentoo's baselayout relies heavily on bash-3 style ... some day
>>i'd like to merge some of the simpler stuff into busybox ... but until then,
>>you'll need bash :)
>>>Im using Gentoo glibc-2.4-r2 + the patch you spotted.
>>if you sync up, that patch is now in 2.4-r2
>>For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
More information about the crossgcc