arm eabi boot progress.

[Steve Papacharalambous]

Hi Steve,

Which kernel headers did you finally use?

Best regards,

Steve

Steven Newbury wrote:
> I do believe Im there! I had two problems in the end, bash built natively and
> works perfectly. The other thing was the kernel headers. 2.6.16 headers,
> including those provided by gentoo are broken with respect to ARM EABI.
> Syscalls that were removed but still defined were confusing glibc. This is in
> addition to those that were fixed in the glibc patch.
> 
> --- crossgcc-owner@sourceware.org <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>>On Wednesday 26 April 2006 14:01, Steven Newbury wrote:
>>
>>>Busybox works here too. It doesnt seem to be bashy enough to init Gentoo
>>>though.
>>
>>correct ... Gentoo's baselayout relies heavily on bash-3 style ... some day 
>>i'd like to merge some of the simpler stuff into busybox ... but until then, 
>>you'll need bash :)
>>
>>
>>>Im using Gentoo glibc-2.4-r2 + the patch you spotted. 
>>
>>if you sync up, that patch is now in 2.4-r2
>>-mike
>>
>>--
>>For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
>>
> 
> 
> 
> Steve
> 
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 
> 
> --
> For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
> 
> 

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq