crosstool bloat

David Karlton dkarlton@themediamall.com
Thu Sep 22 20:01:00 GMT 2005



Dave Korn wrote:
> ----Original Message----
> 
>>From: David Karlton
>>Sent: 22 September 2005 15:04
> 
> 
>>Dave Korn wrote:
>>
>>>----Original Message----
> 
> 
>>Still have the bloat issue, but I *was* able to build the toolchain on
>>Fedora now (the issue with the glibc-2.3.2 configure script complaining
>>that my gcc 4.0.0 compiler was not acceptable).
>>
>>So, this thread (crosstool bloat) is still an issue, but the "Building
>>on Fedora" issue has been resolved (though now there are posts on both
>>threads related to the bloat problem).
> 
> 
> 
>   Try this patch: it looks like perhaps the best option of all, as it
> (IIUIC) eliminates the useage of a separate data *segment* within the text
> *section*, which is why the linker has to explicitly pad the placement and
> can't just let the loader do it.
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00712.html
> 
>   With due thanks to Thiemo Seufer
> (http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-09/msg00253.html)!
> 
> 
>     cheers,
>       DaveK


FIXED.

No more 60k bloat.

As I postulated from the beginning, you guys are my heroes.

Thanks again.

dk


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com



More information about the crossgcc mailing list