crosstool bloat
Dave Korn
dave.korn@artimi.com
Thu Sep 22 17:47:00 GMT 2005
----Original Message----
>From: David Karlton
>Sent: 22 September 2005 15:04
> Dave Korn wrote:
>> ----Original Message----
>
> Still have the bloat issue, but I *was* able to build the toolchain on
> Fedora now (the issue with the glibc-2.3.2 configure script complaining
> that my gcc 4.0.0 compiler was not acceptable).
>
> So, this thread (crosstool bloat) is still an issue, but the "Building
> on Fedora" issue has been resolved (though now there are posts on both
> threads related to the bloat problem).
Try this patch: it looks like perhaps the best option of all, as it
(IIUIC) eliminates the useage of a separate data *segment* within the text
*section*, which is why the linker has to explicitly pad the placement and
can't just let the loader do it.
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00712.html
With due thanks to Thiemo Seufer
(http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-09/msg00253.html)!
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list