Is a target glibc really needed to build full crossgcc?

[Marius Groeger]

On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Andrew STUBBS wrote:

> Luckily you only need the reproductive tract of the chicken (xgcc, cc1) in 
> order to produce the egg (glibc headers) which can then produce a full (C 
> only) chicken. xgcc and cc1 can be built without headers or libraries given 
> the right make incantations. Don't even try to build C++ without a full glibc 
> (ostrich egg?), it just isn't worth it once you have a C compiler for glibc.

*ROTFL* Billiant summary...

Marius

-- 
Marius Groeger <mgroeger@sysgo.com>
SYSGO AG                      Embedded and Real-Time Software
Voice: +49 6136 9948 0                  FAX: +49 6136 9948 10
www.sysgo.com | www.elinos.com | www.osek.de | www.pikeos.com


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com