is that "install glibc headers" step in crosstool necessary?
Mike Frysinger
vapier@gentoo.org
Sat Nov 26 19:54:00 GMT 2005
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 07:24:10AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>In summary, it *is* possible to build cross-toolchains on some arch's
> >>without the Glibc headers step...
> >
> >
> >and it's quite trivial to patch all the other arches (except for ia64) to
> >not need libc or kernel headers
>
> Problem is, we'd have to carry those patches in crosstool
> for the old versions. Is it worth the bother?
i'm not suggesting we add this to crosstool, i'm merely talking about
whether it can be done
> For new versions, the patches should be submitted upstream
> if they're not already in.
ive tried before and for linux targets, people told me to take a hike
> What's the deal with ia64?
i believe it comes from all the libunwind stuff which ia64 requires
-mike
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list