[PATCH] Add partial big-endian SH support to gcc/configure.
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday@mindspring.com
Mon Nov 14 19:05:00 GMT 2005
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:48:57PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:41:07PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > > +- sh-*-* | sh[34]-*-*)
> > > > ++ sh-*-* | sh[34]-*-* | sh[34]eb-*-*)
> > >
> > > why not just use sh[34]* ? afaict, the requirement they're going
> > > for here is that the cpu be sh3 or sh4.
> >
> > i don't know enough about the various cores to make that sweeping
> > generalization. if you don't think there's a problem, i can re-submit
> > to be more general. i was just going for the patch to deal with the
> > specific issue *i* was having.
>
> lets just ask Kaz ;)
works for me. i'm off for a couple of hours so if someone wants to
submit a revised patch, that's fine.
rday
NOTE!!!!!! keep in mind that this is not a patch being submitted
upstream for inclusion in gcc, it's just for this upcoming version of
crosstool, that's all. i've already submitted a bugzilla report for
this and i *fully* expect someone else who knows more about this than
i do to properly patch gcc, whenever they get around to it.
but if there's an *obviously* better solution than the one i posted,
go wild. i'm not territorial.
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list