crosstool and uClibc
Robert Schwebel
robert@schwebel.de
Sat Jul 9 20:23:00 GMT 2005
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 07:04:31AM -0700, Daniel Kegel wrote:
> (I think I prefer separate scripts to functions, but I'm not sure.)
Ok.
> >Dan, do you have a valuable plan about when to merge uClibc support? I'd
> >go through the porting procedure again, but IMHO it does only make sense
> >if the chances for upstream acceptance are good.
>
> When I last checked two months ago,
> the uclibc patches to gcc weren't quite ready to go upstream yet:
> http://www.uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2005-May/011679.html
>
> I guess I'll ping them again and see what the situation is.
Sounds like a plan, but I don't think that the situation has changed
significantly.
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list