crosstool and uClibc

[Daniel Kegel]

Robert Schwebel wrote:
> Hmm, I didn't update the latest patches in PTXdist which add working
> uClibc support to crosstool recently, because Dan was in favour of a
> "put stuff into a function" solution instead of lots of if...else
> sections (which would be good for crosstool anyway). 

(I think I prefer separate scripts to functions, but I'm not sure.)

> Dan, do you have a valuable plan about when to merge uClibc support? I'd
> go through the porting procedure again, but IMHO it does only make sense
> if the chances for upstream acceptance are good. 

When I last checked two months ago,
the uclibc patches to gcc weren't quite ready to go upstream yet:
http://www.uclibc.org/lists/uclibc/2005-May/011679.html

I guess I'll ping them again and see what the situation is.
- Dan

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com