glibc-2.4 changes

[Lennert Buytenhek]

On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 03:01:09PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:

> >It seems like a logical conclusion to make that moving the code for
> >non-"desktop" CPUs (whatever that's supposed to mean) to 'ports' can
> >only be because of the same reason.
> 
> Yes.  But again, they won't stop other people from maintaining it.

They seem to have done a pretty good job at that so far, though.

If you think that it'll be easier for people to get patches in now that
stuff has been moved to 'ports', I disagree.  In fact, if you ask me, I
think that support for these platforms is going away no matter whether
anyone likes it or not.


--L

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com