ldrb vs ldrh in gcc-3.4.4 (ARM)
Steven Scholz
steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de
Thu Aug 18 09:13:00 GMT 2005
Richard,
>>>>ARGH! There's no "--with-cpu=arm920t" !
>>>
>>>This has been fixed in gcc-4.0 and it's also been fixed in the
>>>CodeSourcery version of 3.4
>>>(http://www.codesourcery.com/gnu_toolchains/arm/).
>>>
>>>>gcc/config/arm/arm.h only knows
>>>>
>>>>#define TARGET_CPU_arm9 0x0080
>>>>#define TARGET_CPU_arm9tdmi 0x0080
>>
>>I suppose it's defined as 0x0080 as well!?
>
> The new code takes a completely different approach to configuring the
> default cpu. It's no-longer done with #defines in the way that a stock
> 3.4 release did.
Ah. Ok.
But since I want/have to build my own tool chain I'd use "--with-cpu=arm9" for now.
Thanks a million for your help!
--
Steven
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list