ldrb vs ldrh in gcc-3.4.4 (ARM)

Steven Scholz steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de
Thu Aug 18 09:13:00 GMT 2005


Richard,

>>>>ARGH! There's no "--with-cpu=arm920t" !
>>>
>>>This has been fixed in gcc-4.0 and it's also been fixed in the
>>>CodeSourcery version of 3.4
>>>(http://www.codesourcery.com/gnu_toolchains/arm/).
>>>
>>>>gcc/config/arm/arm.h only knows
>>>>
>>>>#define TARGET_CPU_arm9         0x0080
>>>>#define TARGET_CPU_arm9tdmi     0x0080
>>
>>I suppose it's defined as 0x0080 as well!?
> 
> The new code takes a completely different approach to configuring the
> default cpu.  It's no-longer done with #defines in the way that a stock
> 3.4 release did.

Ah. Ok.
But since I want/have to build my own tool chain I'd use "--with-cpu=arm9" for now.

Thanks a million for your help!

--
Steven


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com



More information about the crossgcc mailing list