ldrb vs ldrh in gcc-3.4.4 (ARM)

[Richard Earnshaw]

On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 09:40, Steven Scholz wrote:
> Richard Earnshaw wrote:

> >>
> >>ARGH! There's no "--with-cpu=arm920t" !
> >>
> > 
> > This has been fixed in gcc-4.0 and it's also been fixed in the
> > CodeSourcery version of 3.4
> > (http://www.codesourcery.com/gnu_toolchains/arm/).
> > 
> > 
> >>gcc/config/arm/arm.h only knows
> >>
> >>#define TARGET_CPU_arm9         0x0080
> >>#define TARGET_CPU_arm9tdmi     0x0080
> 
> I suppose it's defined as 0x0080 as well!?

The new code takes a completely different approach to configuring the
default cpu.  It's no-longer done with #defines in the way that a stock
3.4 release did.

R.

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com