ldrb vs ldrh in gcc-3.4.4 (ARM)
Steven Scholz
steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de
Wed Aug 17 14:18:00 GMT 2005
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 04:00:23PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
>
>
>>Permissible names are: armv2, armv2a, armv3, armv3m, armv4, armv4t,
>> armv5, armv5t, armv5te.
>>
>>Which one would be appropriate for an Atmel AT91RM9200?
>
>
> First google hit on "AT91RM9200":
> http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/product_card.asp?part_id=2983
>
> That page mentions that it's an ARM920T core. First google hit on
> "ARM920T":
> http://www.arm.com/products/CPUs/ARM920T.html
>
> That page mentions 'ARMv4T'.
Thanks for googling for me! ;-)
So I use either -march=armv4 _OR_ -mcpu=arm920t. Right?
(Using both brought me a warning about conflicting).
--
Steven
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list