Where does crosstool get its "kernel" includes?
Marius Groeger
mgroeger@sysgo.com
Tue Sep 14 14:30:00 GMT 2004
Dan,
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Marius Groeger wrote:
>> @Dan,Alex: Why are you using sanitized headers anyway, other than that it
>> is probably ideologically nicer, smaller, etc. towards the apps? I'm only
>> using regular headers and never ran into serious problems.
>
> There are a few apps that don't compile properly with
> regular kernel headers. IMHO the right thing to do
> is fix the regular kernel source; usually it's fairly simple.
...
> (like maybe generic scsi and ext2? I don't recall exactly.)
If you do recall, or happen to run into any of those issues again,
will you drop me a line, please? I do recall certain peculiarities
with very low level tools, but nothing ever made me even remotely
consider using modified kernel headers. I would like to make sure
nothing slipped my attention.
Regards,
Marius
--
Marius Groeger <mgroeger@sysgo.com>
SYSGO AG Embedded and Real-Time Software
Voice: +49 6136 9948 0 FAX: +49 6136 9948 10
www.sysgo.com | www.elinos.com | www.osek.de | www.imerva.com
------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
More information about the crossgcc
mailing list