Is gcc 2.95 or 3 faster for M68K app?

[Toralf Lund]

Dan Kegel wrote:

> Toralf Lund wrote:
>
>> I have an app that needs to run faster on an old M68k board... It is 
>> currently built using gcc 2.95.3, so I'm wondering if upgrading to 
>> gcc version 3 would have any real benefit in terms of speed.
>
>
> Probably not.  Version 4 might, though, especially version 4.1.

Too bad...

Maybe I'll have to go back to the old setup, then ;-(

This is a bit depressing... I've been using a compiler from Microware 
released some 20 years ago, and generates binaries that are about half 
the size of the gcc ones, and even without optimisation are faster than 
gcc -02 output... It's only running on a (different) Motorola board, 
though, which is why I'd prefer using a gcc cross compiler setup

>
>> The reason why I'm asking instead of just trying is that I wasn't 
>> able to build gcc 3.4.2 directly. Got a strage recursion in the 
>> configure calls...
>
>
> Did you try using http://kegel.com/crosstool to build a cross-compiler?
> That seems to work...

> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>>> The reason why I'm asking instead of just trying is that I wasn't 
>>> able to build gcc 3.4.2 directly. Got a strage recursion in the 
>>> configure calls...
>>
>>
>>
>> Did you try using http://kegel.com/crosstool to build a cross-compiler?
>> That seems to work...
>
>
> Oh, sorry, you're using newlib.  I don't handle that yet.

OK. I also want to generate rpms (do you support that?), so I've written 
my own a spec file, but it has borrowed a lot from Bill Gatliff's 
build-crossgcc.sh

Actually, gcc 3.3.3 did work all right, but I'm not actually able to 
generate the application with it (yet.)

- Toralf



------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com