toolchain requirements submission
Thu Jun 17 16:42:00 GMT 2004
Marius Groeger wrote:
> FWIW, I can provide big-endian (BE) patches for binutils 2.14 and gcc
> 3.2.3 which I believe should work, but which I could never test due to
> lack of HW. I'd gladly provide them to anyone interested and would
> like to get any feedback on them.
> The patches aim at getting a toolchain which _defaults_ to BE, rather
> than the standard one which merely is _capable_ of generating BE by
> throwing some commandline switches.
If the patches are suitable for mainline use, i.e. if
they only set BE mode if you ask for it by target name at
configuration time, then I'd like to include them in crosstool.
> PS. Before someone reminds me: I _am_ aware of gcc 3.2.3's
> deficiencies on ARM, and I have already collected and applied the
> fixes neccessary. :-)
Is your collection online somewhere?
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to email@example.com
More information about the crossgcc