crosstool and .rpm's

Dan Kegel
Fri Jul 30 16:42:00 GMT 2004

Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> Em Thursday 29 July 2004 20:39, you wrote:
>>Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
>>Thanks.  Are the extra patches inside your attached patch good
>>enough to contribute back to gcc mainline?
>>e.g. would it be sensible to do
>>   mv debian/patches/glibc-2.3.2-csu-make.patch
>>patches/glibc-2.3.2/glibc-2.3.2-csu-make.patch ?
> Yes. In fact I have already emailed it:

I guess I'll test with dash, then.  Is this the right URL?
Also, have you verified that patch works with other shells?

All the others are already in crosstool:
Why the duplication?  Oh, your procedure doesn't use *any* of the
patches in the crosstool patch repository, so you had to
copy the ones you felt you needed, I guess.
- Dan

My technical stuff:
My politics: see for examples of why I'm for regime change

Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ,
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to

More information about the crossgcc mailing list