gcc-3.4.X + glibc segfault
Mon Jul 26 17:38:00 GMT 2004
Dan Kegel wrote:
> Jake Page wrote:
>> I found this message from a while back (like 2 months ago...):
>> ...and was wondering if you ever figured out what was going on.
> Yes, I think it was gcc-3.4.1 optimizing a bit much.
> Here's a workaround backported from cvs to glibc-2.3.2:
Er, I forgot the 2nd part of that patch:
Let us know what happens.
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to firstname.lastname@example.org
More information about the crossgcc